Performance curves: reading a test back to water flow
Cold-water temperature against flow, one curve per wet bulb, and the inverse solve back to flow.
Cold-water temperature against water flow, one curve per entering wet bulb at a fixed range, and the inverse solve from a measured cold-water temperature back to the flow the curve predicts.
Reference conditions: test flow 200 kg/s, entering wet bulb 27 °C, range 10 K, measured cold water 32.80 °C — a predicted 32.50 °C at 200 kg/s and, inverted, 210 kg/s at 32.80 °C, a capability of 95.2 %.
Formula: CWTgrid(WB, range, qpredicted) − CWTtest = 0 solved for the flow, then Capability % = 100 × qtest, adjusted / qpredicted and ΔTc = Tctest − Tcpredicted.
Sources
- Hensley, J.C. (ed.) — Cooling Tower Fundamentals, 2nd edition (SPX Cooling Technologies, 2009) — the performance-curve family this article describes, and the two code measures of capability it reproduces — test flow over predicted flow, and the characteristic-curve alternative.
- CTI ATC-105 — Acceptance Test Code for Water Cooling Towers — the Cooling Technology Institute’s acceptance test code for water cooling towers, referenced by this article’s statement that the corrections before the interpolation belong to the test code; not reproduced here.
- Kloppers & Kröger — Cooling tower performance: a critical evaluation of the Merkel assumptions (SAIMechE, 2004) — the Merkel demand the curves of the chart are inverted against.
- ASHRAE Handbook—Fundamentals (2025 edition) — Psychrometrics — the moist-air relations the chart’s saturation-enthalpy values are computed from.
- Buck Research Instruments — CR-1A User’s Manual, Appendix 1: Humidity Conversion Equations (revised 7/96) — the saturation vapour pressure the chart evaluates.
